You also claim 30 years exp. in consulting in tax related areas. That's funny. You may have been an employee for 30 years, but you don't get the big picture of taxation and business.
He claims to be a "Tax Consultant" , while he indicates others here on FR need not pay their income and payroll taxes using the 861 TP argument and such clap trap. LOL.
You know like in Thurston Bell's organisation, you can pay him several thousand dollars and call your self a consultant, charge hundereds of dollars an hour, hyping Bell's Americans aren't required to pay income taxes line of the 861, subChapter 'N bovine excretement and similar such clap trap getting folks into deep trouble.
Like one of Bell's protoge's who failed to remit FICA for his employees and then keeps it for himself instead and not informing them or giving them therr full paycheck so they can submitt FICA on their own as independant contractors.
Real nice bunch of guys these are.
United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1991)
Argued that there is no law imposing a tax on income, that state citizens are exempt from income tax.
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
- Like moths to a flame, some people find themselves irresistibly drawn to the tax protestor movement's illusory claim that there is no legal requirement to pay federal income tax. And, like the moths, these people sometimes get burned. Lorin G. Sloan believed these claims and because he acted upon them now faces four months in a federal prison; there can be little doubt that he has been burned.
- The real tragedy of this case is the unconscionable waste of Mr. Sloan's time, resources, and emotion in continuing to pursue these wholly defective and unsuccessful arguments about the validity of the income tax laws of the United States. Despite our rejection of Mr. Sloan's legal analysis of the tax laws, we are not unmindful of the sincerity of his beliefs. On the other hand, we are less sure of the sincerity of the professional tax protestors who promote their views in literature and meetings to persons like Mr. Sloan, yet are unlikely ever to face the type of penalties incurred by him. It may be that our decision will not alter Mr. Sloan's views regarding the tax laws of this country, for he has stated that if we affirm his conviction without applying the law as he understands it, our decision will be "a sham to which I WILL NOT SUBMIT." It may also be that serving his sentence in prison will not alter Mr. Sloan's view. We hope this pessimistic assessment is incorrect.
- We AFFIRM the conviction of Lorin G. Sloan on all counts.
A good article published in The New American to read and consider:
Patriot Beware!
by Thomas R. Eddlem
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1997/vo13no04/vo13no04_patriot.htm