Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dread78645
I'm fine with it either way.
623 posted on 11/06/2002 11:55:26 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
I'm fine with it either way.

Good enough.
Just pointing out dangers of "exemptions"

624 posted on 11/07/2002 12:02:19 AM PST by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; dread78645; Principled; Taxman
Why should the lawmakers come up with definitions ? The definitions started the mess! The only honest way out (I think), is to tax every end consumer, then give a universal rebate of taxes up to the poverty level. Just like the current bills say (HR2525)

To: dread78645 I'm fine with it either way. 623 posted on 11/06/2002 11:55 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Me too. I'm not stupid. The IRS must die.
I'll take whatever National Retail Sales Tax we are offered.

I will not make the "Perfect" out to be the enemy of the "Good".

But much as I like the "Good" (Keyes-Tax NRST with "politically-defined" Exemptions and Loopholes)...

...I'd dang sure prefer the "Perfect" (Fair-Tax NRST with a straight, flat Rebate) if we have a chance at it!!

626 posted on 11/07/2002 12:08:53 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson