Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agitator
Bend over, here it comes again. A "national retail sales tax" is not constitutional, neither is a "flat tax." Neither is the fiat currency system that we currently "enjoy" which is the enabler of all of the social welfare programs and legions of bureaucrats ruining this country. People need to study history a little more. I'll crawl back under my bridge now

It would certainly be a tax on the poor, while it would be 'fairer' to tax all the ssame rate for income, it would not be fair to tax someone on expenditure without some sort of non-taxable commodities put on a no-tax list.

Poor people do not buy cars at any high rate, rich people do, and they may pay more per price in tax, they have the money to. Poor do not have the extra cash. HOWEVER, if they have less taken out of their check...and if they save it...

315 posted on 11/06/2002 3:29:15 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon
It would certainly be a tax on the poor, while it would be 'fairer' to tax all the ssame rate for income, it would not be fair to tax someone on expenditure without some sort of non-taxable commodities put on a no-tax list.

" ... to ensure that no American will pay tax on necessities, the FairTax plan provides a prepaid, monthly rebate for every registered household to cover the 23% consumption tax spent on necessities up to the federal poverty level. This is how the FairTax completely untaxes the poor, and lowers the tax burden on everyone else."

Learn something new

612 posted on 11/06/2002 10:37:05 PM PST by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson