Ummmm, the novel and astonishing notion and blindfold of the reformers that unless something is "Scriptural," it is not to be believed or relied on, such as the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption. See your post #90.
Ummmm, the novel and astonishing notion and blindfold of the reformers that unless something is "Scriptural," it is not to be believed or relied on, such as the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption. See your post #90.
I suggest you read #90 again. My observation is the "convenient" editing of meandog's post managed to change the entire intent of the post.
If it was accidental, shame on Polycarp. Be more careful.
If it was deliberate, Shame on Polycarp. Be more honest.
My reply to you:
Stick to the subject. Do you understand what "Scripture" is and what is not "Scripture"?