Scattered problems mar debut of touchscreens and other high-tech voting systems
ANICK JESDANUN, Associated Press Writer Tuesday, November 5, 2002
(11-05) 16:22 PST (AP) --
Scattered problems, a few serious but most described as hiccups, marred the debut of touchscreens and other high-tech voting machines Tuesday, including in all of Georgia and in Florida's most election-challenged counties.
The most serious appeared in two Georgia counties where officials said they could result in contested elections and lawsuits. The state has the nation's largest deployment: 22,000 touchscreens.
In one county, ballots in at least three precincts listed the wrong county commission races. Officials shut down the polls at one point to fix the problem but didn't know how many wrong ballots were cast or how to correct errant votes. In another, a county commission race was omitted from a ballot.
Elsewhere, some machines froze up and others had to be rebooted. Dozens were misprogrammed, and cards voters need to access machines malfunctioned.
"They are locking up, and we have to turn them off and turn them on. The voting is taking a little longer," said Mary Cranford, election superintendent in Georgia's Coweta County.
But those troubles did not look to have the potential to cascade into the meltdown seen during the Sept. 10 primaries in Florida, where Democratic gubernatorial contest results were delayed for a week.
Analysts said better planning and training of poll workers in operating the machines paid off, though some cautioned that the new systems' reliability can't be guaranteed.
"A lot of these products were rushed to market," said Rebecca Mercuri, a Bryn Mawr College computer science professor and expert on election technology.
The addition of more than 200 brings to 510 the number of counties nationwide with electronic voting systems, according to Election Data Services, a Washington, D.C., research company. That's 16 percent of counties representing one in five registered voters.
Analysts expect 75 percent of counties to have such systems within six years, boosted largely by a new $3.9 billion federal law to help states replace outdated equipment.
Election officials were anxious heading into Tuesday, given problems encountered with touchscreens during September primaries in Florida and Maryland. They stepped up poll-worker training to better cope with any machine failures.
"It was definitely an open question on September 10th whether the problem was the machines or the people running them. Now, it's leaning toward the explanation that it was the people," said Dan Seligson, spokesman for Electionline.org, a nonpartisan election-reform group.
In Montgomery County, Md., where results of a tight congressional primary race were delayed by faulty planning, a programming error caused machines at 30 precincts to display a ballot with a header reading "Democratic."
The header would normally be blank, but the glitch does not affect the tally, said Margie Roher, an elections administrator.
In Florida's Miami-Dade County, one of two most troubled during the primaries, machines were misprogrammed at one precinct, meaning voters had to use substitute paper ballots for the first three hours.
Forty to 50 touchscreen machines scattered among more than 5,000 in Broward County had to be taken offline because of incorrectly loaded software or the wrong ballot, officials said. The glitches did not prevent anyone from casting votes, they added.
Former Attorney General Janet Reno, who during the primary had been delayed because machines weren't ready, voted on schedule Tuesday.
"They were prepared for me this time," she said.
Many voters offered good reviews in Georgia.
"It's almost too simple," Joe Penley of Barnesville raved. "My 4-year-old granddaughter could do it. It's hard to make errors if you just follow instructions."
Nonetheless, one touchscreen machine locked up and crashed as Mary Perdue, wife of Georgia's Republican gubernatorial candidate Sonny Perdue, was voting. Officials rebooted the computer, and she continued with ease.
"Any time you have that many new computers, you're going to have some problems, but the workers handled it well," she said.
No troubles were reported in the nation's largest county to go all-electronic: Harris County, Texas, which includes Houston. Harris' system uses a dial to highlight names rather than a touchscreen.
But in Tarrant County, Texas, which includes Fort Worth, officials said tallies may not be finalized until Wednesday night because of a programming error with older-style machines.
Mercuri warned that some problems with the new touchscreen systems may never be known because they lack paper backups for doublechecking ballots.
Diebold Election Systems, which supplied machines for Georgia and Maryland, said election officials never asked for such features, which worries Mercuri.
She said any misprogramming isn't always obvious, "so there's no way to prove that (a machine) didn't cast a vote for Candidate B when you cast for Candidate A."
AP Technology Editor Frank Bajak contributed to this report.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/11/05/politics1805EST0726.DTL
Wow I just got done going over a video from a investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker. The video was called the "The Big Fix 2000". And he basically went back and traced were the voting machines involved in the voting so called iregularities came from, and he also looked into the fact that there are only a handful of company's involved in the election process in this nation with Sequoia Pacific responsible for the counting of one third of American voters ballots cast in any election. Sequoia Pacific some time in the past seen fit to change there name to Sequoia Voting systems. My own county just brought in the new touch screen machines wich were produced by none other than Sequoia Voting Systems. Straight from Manhattan Elections Commissioner Douglas Kilner, Sequoia Pacific refused to provide documentation as to the security of it's voting machines, when it was bidding on providing these machines to Manhattan. They also refused to allow any election officials to look at the tabulation code to verify it was accurate and un corruptable. But any computer person with a programming background could quite easily fix the code to tabulate votes in such a way to ensure that what ever candidate they wanted would win the election. And computerized voting machines leave no paper trail to prove otherwise! He also said that Sequoia and other similiar companys are guilty of misleading elections officials as to the security of these systems. He also said some are guilty of bribery. Imagine that! What is even more concerning is who owns these companys. Daniel Hopsicker uncovered that many of these companys are owned by persons that have some very shady backgrounds. Felons & known mobsters, maybe even worse foreigners with criminal pasts. Sequoia Pacific itself is owned by a Dr. Michael Smurfit a extremely wealthy Irish doctory , who has been indicted for fraud in spain & under possible indictment over a leveraged buy out of an american container shipping company tied in some how with Mobile Oil. I went to Sequoia Voting systems web site www.sequoiavote.com and found that Sequoia is now being aquired by another foreign company De La Rue wich is aquiring an 85% share in the company just has Sequoia begins to brach out into all kinds of neat ventures , like fraud proof id's , and fraud proof driver's licenses for the state of N.Y. and I.D. cards for some south american country's. Ian Much chief executive of De La Rue said the Smurfitt would retain 15% interest in the company, and that it's aquisition of 85% interst in Sequoia fits in with De La Rue's traditional business of protecting financial value & personal identity. There considered a leader in secure currency & cash management , with that last bit being that they print one in five of every one of the World's Bank noets! As stated on the Sequoia web site. They also recently got a contract to produce 500million euro's for the European Central Bank! De La Rue is based in Hampshire England! Our system of voting and our very constitution has been subverted by foriegn company's, criminals, and even our past rulers from europe. When will we all take notice, and take back our country and reinstate our constitutional rights as they were meant when our founding fathers wrote them. I suggest anyone interested in taking a look at this video on you're own go to his web site at www.madcowprod.com , he's also looked into many other areas of criminality! Oh yes and those machines that had so many problems in FL. in 2000. Were the same machines that caused similiar problems in Louisiana in a past election. Louisiana was ordered to destroy the machines and not resel them to any other states for election purposes! They first tried to pawn them off to N.Y. according to Douglas Kelner Manhattan Elections Comissioner!