Replies

This will hopefully result in some actual prosecutions.

Yes, and IF it is true, you can bet there is a solid evidence trail to who had access and programming knowledge for these machines. Of course, the final responsibility lies with the Democratic-controlled election board who had responsibility not only for ensuring that the machines were correctly programmed, but also for the secure storage of the machines before this crucial day.

I voted on a touchscreen for the first time today. I'm pretty computer savvy, and I don't see how what the caller claims is possible. When you insert your access card, the screen shows "Loading Ballot". Then you touch your choices, plain as day. When you're through, you get a ballot review screen which shows all your votes before they are recorded, and you can go back and change any you want. Maybe the caller meant that the ballot review screen showed Bush instead of McBride, and he/she/it had to change it? Anyway, from the ballot review screen you finally press "Cast Vote" and the screen shows "Recording Your Votes". You would never know if there was some internal problem past the ballot review screen, and so I question the authenticity of this obviously dem caller.

If someone was going to be clever enough to sabotage the machine so it counted a McBride vote as Bush, THEY WOULDN'T DO IT SO THE SCREEN SHOWED THE CHANGE. They would simply add the McBride vote to the "wrong" database.

That said, I think voting machines are a BIG MISTAKE.

You would never know if there was some internal problem past the ballot review screen, and so I question the authenticity of this obviously dem caller.

Thank you. Apparently, what we learn from this report is that at least one democrat was allowed to vote three times.

It's the usual DNC plan. Create doubt. They couldn't get their poll watchers into place because they did not read the memo issued a month ago by the demorat elections supervisor. I hope they do arrest the bitch and give her 10 years with a fat Rosie type lesbian cellmate.