To: steve-b
There are plenty of portions of their job which cannot be publicized don't be idiotic. Remember when the FBI wouldn't even tell Clinton about the investigation of the RATS campaign contributions from China.
As for the unwillingness to allow taping some point to as indication of Evil intent. Would those believing they should allow this be believers in the Rodney King incident as shown on the mainstream media night after night?
Police routinely break laws that is not an issue. The only issue is which ones are truly sacrosanct. As the cop said to another poster they had to stop the killing. Innocent people are some times even killed by accident by conduct which would be criminal if done outside of fighting crime. Cops around here stood outside refusing to breakdown a door while a PoS was raping a girl. Who with an I.Q. over 70 would support that decision?
To: justshutupandtakeit
Addressing the first few words (those being the only comprehensible portion before the post devolves into stream-of-consciousness drivel), it is quite obvious that the agents could do their admitted job of confirming the records no matter how many people were watching them.
63 posted on
11/05/2002 7:29:08 AM PST by
steve-b
To: justshutupandtakeit
"Cops around here stood outside refusing to breakdown a door while a PoS was raping a girl. Who with an I.Q. over 70 would support that decision?"
And let us never forget the two hundred-plus badged "heroes" of the Battle of Columbine...........
173 posted on
11/05/2002 2:37:55 PM PST by
tracer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson