Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ApesForEvolution
Oh yeh. The dumos will bitch, but the Mo. law says NO REPLACEMENT BALLOTS at all! They were givin a favor. The supremes will back the election as it is. Mo. was being fairer than required by their election laws.
243 posted on 11/04/2002 10:21:06 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: concerned about politics
The MNSC took the 'out' of actually changing the law, knowing that the ballots couldn't be received in time, setting up 'disenfranchised voters' all over the place, thus easily allowing for a contested result. It's not going to work. I've got to vacate this office for awhile - I'm borrowing it. I'll be back. There's so much excitement right now in the GOP quarters and disappointment in the dems that's everyone is moving furiously...whooo-hooo! If Republican-Minnesotans vote tomorrow the way it looks like they will, Norm wins! And maybe by a 'MN Supreme Court-proof' number!
256 posted on 11/04/2002 10:28:45 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson