[rwfromkansas]

Most of these are very bad.......I am kind of worried.

[rwfromkansas]

Turnout will be EVERYTHING.

[cinFLA]

"Most of these are very bad.......I am kind of worried."

Somebody please recheck but I have:
R 6
D 4
(GA too close)

If we get GA and get a miracle in ME then it is:
R 8
D 3

[winin2000]

Most of these are very bad.......I am kind of worried.

What did you just read? I see two likely pickups, two likely losses, and a copout on Georgia with a note that a slight plurality feel Cleland doesn't deserve reelection.

Jeez, people, I understand the gun-shyness given what happened in 2000, but lighten up and learn to take good news when you hear it!

And for trivia buffs, Gallup gave us only a 2 point edge going into 1994; we have 5 points today, and several other polls corroborating it. Be happy!!

[ApesForEvolution]

Which is probably why YOU shouldn't read the polls. Unless, of course, it motivates you, in which case, GET OUT DOOR TO DOOR AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Are you old enough to vote? Then vote. Take friends with you. 60% of the electorate don't even know the issues, but vote on 'feelings' or other intangible bs.

Go out there and make a difference where it can be made.

God bless...

[CyberAnt]

Actually, there are only a couple which look to be in trouble - Hutchinson (which we already knew about), Allard - who could still pull it out, along with Chambliss. So, Hutchinson is the only one who looks like he has too far to go to pick up a win. But the other two could still make it.

All the others close races look like they are sitting good going into the election.

So, I don't agree that most of these look bad.

[montag813]

Most of these are very bad.......I am kind of worried.

"401k voters" seem to be decisive for the Dems. Looks like the corporate issue working after all, despite Clinton/Enron McAuliffe/Global Xing connections.