To: Jeff Chandler
You might not be so glib if Saddam had the microwave weapons, no?
To: independentmind
Depends on their range.
To: independentmind
But seriously, does this sound so much worse than flamethrowers, napalm, hand grenades, mortars, rockets, cannons, rifles, daisy cutters, FAEs, etc., etc., etc.?
Have you considered the possibility that this weapon may be used to repel an enemy without permanently injuring him? That it could, in fact, end up being more humane than current weaponry?
To: independentmind
There is a school of thought that these futuristic types of weapons are O.K. for us to use, but criminal if anyone else uses them. If some foreign country used such a weapon against American soldiers or civilians, those who are supporters of our having this type of weapon would be horrified and would demand punishment for the weapon's users.
29 posted on
11/02/2002 6:32:46 PM PST by
Korth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson