Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler
You might not be so glib if Saddam had the microwave weapons, no?
15 posted on 11/02/2002 5:58:12 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind
Depends on their range.
16 posted on 11/02/2002 6:04:56 PM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind
But seriously, does this sound so much worse than flamethrowers, napalm, hand grenades, mortars, rockets, cannons, rifles, daisy cutters, FAEs, etc., etc., etc.?

Have you considered the possibility that this weapon may be used to repel an enemy without permanently injuring him? That it could, in fact, end up being more humane than current weaponry?
18 posted on 11/02/2002 6:10:43 PM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind
There is a school of thought that these futuristic types of weapons are O.K. for us to use, but criminal if anyone else uses them. If some foreign country used such a weapon against American soldiers or civilians, those who are supporters of our having this type of weapon would be horrified and would demand punishment for the weapon's users.
29 posted on 11/02/2002 6:32:46 PM PST by Korth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson