[Dog Gone]

The attorney you spoke to can't be correct. If you can't challenge for unlawful assistance, then the law is meaningless.

I still believe that the very presence of poll watchers deters fraud. You have no idea how many attempts were not made simply because you were there.

[Flyer]

If you can't challenge for unlawful assistance, then the law is meaningless.

That is what I have to believe, too. I hope to have an answer by Tuesday.

I still believe that the very presence of poll watchers deters fraud. You have no idea how many attempts were not made simply because you were there.

Oh, I barely slowed them down. Maybe they just weren't as blantant about it.

[ForGod'sSake]

The attorney you spoke to can't be correct. If you can't challenge for unlawful assistance, then the law is meaningless.

I just went back through the thread and this particular point jumps out at me. If a poll watcher cannot issue a challange regarding voter assistance, then who is authorized to challange?

I wonder just how long the RATS have been running their scams on Pubbies? Long enough to become comfortable with it apparently?

FGS

[dix]

The attorney Flyer talked to is David Berg. I know David Berg, and I used to be friends with a lawyer who he represented in a civil matter.Berg is a devious, rat sleaze ball. I know many attorneys who are good guys, but this one ain’t. I could write you a book on this slime.