Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pern
No, the system is fine, and a natural result of majority rule. The parties themselves are the problem.

Also, the American electorate is a big part of the problem. Our form of government assumes people care.

People who support a "third party" need to realize it's much like the "third world" trying to catch up to the rest of the world. There's a long road to generating a big enough base to get recognized. It involves a lot of work and would not happen in an instant. Third parties often want recognition on the national scale without laying the groundwork for it. That's why they fail.

The current two majority parties or having some real problems, Dems especially. They might be in serious trouble over the next decade. There is an opportunity for another group to take thier place. I really think Perot could have made a splash in '92 if he wasn't, well...Perot.

4 posted on 11/02/2002 5:51:21 AM PST by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jalapeno
The two(2) party system my be riden with problems but I can't get the thought of spreading the vote too thin and getting some whack job elected. If all election were decided by just a few percent across a dozen parties it would be possible for the American Nazi Trans-Gender Party to get a candidate elected. Look how screwed up some other countries have gotten with just such a system.

PS: ANTGP is made up.
10 posted on 11/02/2002 5:58:37 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno
You're being silly. I knew a jerk who voted for Perot in 1992.

He got Clinton instead. Third parties are just spoilers... nothing more.

I tend to call them “the fools party”.

11 posted on 11/02/2002 6:04:57 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jalapeno
No, the system is fine, and a natural result of majority rule. The parties themselves are the problem.

Are you kidding? The *system* is so far away from the original intent of having citizens - albeit those with means and property - from serving in Congress to one where only millions upon millions of dollars will get you elected - AFTER you have sold your soul to those in charge of *your* respective party.

I don't like restrictions on free speech that the campaign finance laws trample over, but without a way for our best and brightest to even get a SHOT at a seat in Congress, this country will continue to wallow in people like the Clintons. /rant off

57 posted on 11/02/2002 12:05:39 PM PST by txzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson