Would you point out where there is not a point for point match between my story and the article's story (except I use theft instead of fraud)? Or are you saying that fraud is not as bad as outright theft? 
Would you point out where there is not a point for point match between my story and the article's story (except I use theft instead of fraud)? Or are you saying that fraud is not as bad as outright theft?
Is this a Martha Steward Enron question?