Suppose a man is unjustly convicted of a crime, and sentenced to life in prison.
While in prison, he is sent gifts and packages from his friends. These people incurred expenses under the false premise of this man's guilt, and associated jail time.
How many of you would deny as part of this man's compensation upon being found innocent and spending 5 years in prison, the cost to his friends of the gifts, the travel expenses for visits, you name it.
Who hear would deny repayment for those GIFTS, in the way that they would deny this former-father reimbersement? I can guess at some of your answers, because many of you fail to address the single fact that every thing that every action that this man took towards that child was done so under the guise of fraud.