To: arthurus
I would not be avwerse to DNA testing being required of all births, to be disclosed only to the woman giving birth, to her husband and/or to the man having putative responsibility. I think that is the ultimate solution, especially for out of wedlock births. In the meantime, any man who is told by a woman not married to him that she is pregnant with his child should demand a test at right before signing anything. A lot of women would be kept honest if the spector of automatic testing loomed.
229 posted on
11/02/2002 10:24:22 AM PST by
LWalk18
To: All
This is a frustrating thread to read.
In the Story:
1. There is nothing that says the man will stop seeing the girl, stop giving her gifts, or stop loving her! NOTHING!
2. There is nothing that says the girl knows there is a lawsuit, much less the details of it!
Therefore, there is nothing to suggest the man is hurting the girls feelings in any way!
The Man is ONLY seeking MONETARY DAMAGES from the MOTHER. THAT IS IT!
(Sigh
)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson