Replies

What he gave was a gift, if you want to reduce it all to legalities.

LOL!! NOOOOOOOOOO! WHAT????

Man, are you spinning now! Look, a gift is something given WILLINGLY!!. Come on, now.

Dont you realize that you are using the same arguments that Liberals use because they dont want strict constitutional judges on the courts?

Arent you aware of that? The laws of this country are very clear on Fraud, they are nonexistant on allowing fraud in the case of tramatising a child.

If you spin any faster, you are going to get very dizzy. You can do better than that.

The question of "willingly" is after the fact of the gift, and just imagine the gimlet eye the judge is going to focus on this plaintiff. It's the public nature of the suit that is part of what I object to, the humiliation of pubicly repudiating a child, and once that harsh card is played he's going to be skewered. That's the card I'd like to see withdrawn--once played, too late, and there may be some retribution for playing it. Life can be harsh on children and other creatures, as you've virtuously reminded me.

*spin*?

Hey, you're the one for literalities and technicalities and the letter of the law and proper exchanges of services and goods for payment. Unilaterals and bilaterals and all that good stuff. I'm just following your lead..