To: BuddhaBoy
Do you realize how this child will react under your idea of justice? (I know, it's the woman's fault. so?). Going after this chump change amounts to a vociferous public rejection of a child, a five year old girl. Is this really what you recommend?
To: Mamzelle
I recommend blaming the mother, and NOT the other innocent party here. Any trauma to this child can rest at the feet of the mother. She can pay for the therapy, or whatever it takes.
The child is not the man's responsibility, period. Nothing he does towards protecting his rights should be at issue. If the child suffers, blame the mother. She did this, no one else.
To: Mamzelle
Do you realize how this child will react under your idea of justice? (I know, it's the woman's fault. so?). Going after this chump change amounts to a vociferous public rejection of a child, a five year old girl. Is this really what you recommend? It's the woman's fault, so? So, as long as there is a child involved what crimes that damage other innocent parties should be forgiven women?
If a con man deceived you and got $10,000 from you, would you just let the money go if it turned out he did it to feed his five year old daughter?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson