--------------------------------------------------------
In my opinion, this is a significant statement by Jayna Davis. I have not read this from her before.Is she suggesting members of the FBI knowingly conspired to cover up for participants in mass murder? If true, wouldn't that be a criminal conspiracy involving the FBI? That sounds very close to being "anti-government" to me.
Or is it only "anti-government" when someone else states the obvious, the FBI participated in a criminal conspiracy to cover up for participants in the mass murder of 168 innocent Americans, including children.
Stating the obvious does not mean you "hate" your government, it simply means you love the truth more.
U.S. Postal Employee Testifies for Grand Jury - TV Reporter Disavows Conspiracy
Through her attorney, Tim McCoy, former KFOR reporter Davis disavowed some of the bombing conspiracy theories that have been reported.
"She also wants to make it perfectly clear that after her two-year exhaustive investigation, she has turned up no credible evidence that supports the theory that the federal government had sufficient prior warnings to prevent the bombing," McCoy said.
Stating the obvious does not mean you "hate" your government, it simply means you love the truth more.
----------------
I couldn't agree more, Sir! In a previous comment on the thread about McCauley's attack on Davis, I wrote:
"After all my years of investigation, I assumed that Susan Otto was referring to Clinton/Reno's de facto conversion of the FBI from the FB of Investigation into the FB of Prosecution and/or the FB of Prevarication. Or worse, as in the cases of Waco and Ruby Ridge, into the FB of Execution."
I do not consider that statement to be "anti-government" or "anti-American", in the least. Since Congress is not living up to its responsibility for keeping Federal agencies (specifically, the FBI and the BATF) in line with the law, IMHO, it is the duty of concerned and knowledgeable citizens to do all they can to keep such bureaucracies from running wild and trampling the Constitution.
It is, after all, OUR government and its agencies that is running amok. Since our employed representatives are not doing their republican duty, we Citizens, as the final employers, are duty-bound to exercise our democratic authority to make sure that both representatives and hirelings alike respect, uphold and defend our Constitution!
TXnMA (No Longer!!!)