Replies

Your entire argument is so weak it is absurd. Do you understand the concept of the food chain? Apparently not. Explain to me how YOU are not the hypocrite by stating that animals have more of a right to life than the innocent unborn human beings? When are you going to begin defending your fellow man? By your rationalization we should just allow the animals to be at the top of the ladder. They already understand how nature works. They won't care whether we want to be eaten or not, AND they don't abort their babies.

I would also appreciate it if you would explain to me why you and I are allowed to seek pleasures in life, but the unborn do not have that option.

If animals don't abort their young, I'm surprised YOU don't think they're higher than we are. I'm simply asking why you think it's ok to kill them for your own culinary pleasures.
And as for fetuses, and eggs and sperm, and the nutrients that go into creating them...if any of them truly have legitimate life then they presumably have souls, right? What's keeping them from going straight to Heaven, then? YOU. Perhaps you want them born so they can contribute money to the church, first? Pass the collection plates around now, please, so Jim and Tammy Fae can keep the air conditioning going for their dogs. At least THEY respected living animals though. But unlike most right-to-lifers, they had all the money they wanted and could afford to spend time and energy caring about living creatures, instead of fundraising and indulgence-purchasing while inflaming passions with pictures of jelly that they claimed was a wasted life. Well the grape seeds killed to make actual jelly is just as potentially viable as a fetus...it's already fertilized in fact, and requires less sacrifice to sprout into a beautiful bush. But I don't see you protesting in front of Welch's. Ah, I see, there's not nearly as much money to make doing that, or guilt to deflect while playing "holier than thou" to others. Oh well.