[End The Hypocrisy]

>>>Let me ask you this: If a child is not adopted, should it be legal to kill it? If a child has a "miserable lot", should it be legal to kill it?<<<


No, it is not legal, and should not be legal, to kill an unwanted child. But there's a prevalent criticism about the non-pro-choice Republicans (the 35% minority that Rym.org and other Republican groups state that they are). That criticism is that "Republicans will get you born, but you're on your own after that." And we wonder why we got fewer presidential votes in 2000 than the more vocally pro-choice political party?

[AppyPappy]

That criticism is that "Republicans will get you born, but you're on your own after that."

Lincoln could have gotten more votes by supporting slavery too.

[Kevin Curry]

That criticism is that "Republicans will get you born, but you're on your own after that."

Pure BS.

Republicans want to make the family secure and strong, because that is where children thrive best. They don't favor welfare state politics that cripple the family and loose children into welfare-ghetto anomie and self-destruction.

Not only do pro-abort liberals (and some Republicans) strive to slaughter children before birth, they wish to cripple and stunt their development if they are lucky enough to survive the abortionist's scissors and caustic abortifacents.

There is no group more depraved and viciously anti-child than the pro-abort liberals.