Skip to comments.
The UN is on the verge of destroying itself
The Ottawa Citizen ^
| October 30, 2002
| David Warren
Posted on 10/31/2002 3:39:20 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Good riddance. Now, what ever will we do with the
$ 800,000,000 a year the US gives it...?
2
posted on
10/31/2002 3:47:32 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Don't worry all the PC educated youth and media of the world will rise up to save the UN.
3
posted on
10/31/2002 3:51:24 PM PST
by
crypt2k
To: pabianice
Good riddance. Now, what ever will we do with the$ 800,000,000 a year the US gives it...?Do the words 'concurrent receipt' ring a bell?
4
posted on
10/31/2002 3:51:58 PM PST
by
gcruse
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
GLORY, GLORY HALLELUJAH
5
posted on
10/31/2002 3:53:34 PM PST
by
demkicker
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The sooner the better. The UN was worthless 57 years ago, and it is still worthless today.
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
If only this were indeed true. I should live long enough to see that day...
7
posted on
10/31/2002 3:56:22 PM PST
by
MarineDad
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: pabianice
**Good riddance. Now, what ever will we do with the
$ 800,000,000 a year the US gives it...?**
The UN has a rather lovely piece of land in NY, too. Whatever can we put there when they are forced to give it BACK to the U.S.? What to do? What to do?
9
posted on
10/31/2002 4:00:11 PM PST
by
kitkat
To: Ragtime Cowgirl; All
10
posted on
10/31/2002 4:00:59 PM PST
by
backhoe
IN 5 DAYS, THEY'LL BE VOTING DEMOCRAT
WHAT ARE YOU DOING TODAY TO HELP TAKE BACK THE SENATE?
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate
To: kitkat
The UN has a rather lovely piece of land in NY, too. Whatever can we put there when they are forced to give it BACK to the U.S.? What to do? What to do? Soccer Fields. Build a soccer program so we'll be able to kick the world's @$$ in everything.
12
posted on
10/31/2002 4:35:29 PM PST
by
Oschisms
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
One could only hope
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Death to the UN!
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
15
posted on
10/31/2002 4:57:30 PM PST
by
Dan Day
To: backhoe
A happy headline is welcome these days. (^:
Like President Reagan before him, he keeps his eye on the main issues, and delegates minor dependant ones. Like Mr. Reagan's secretary of state, George Schultz, he is looking ahead about five years, and to what may be practically achievable on such a reasonably ambitious time scale. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice are also five-year people: a much longer period and you are no longer engaging with reality, a much shorter and you are being controlled by events.
Few of their critics see beyond the moment, which is all very well if you have no responsibilities.
Just say "NO!" to Freepers who put their pride before the country and stay home or vote third party this election day.
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
the Security of America is up to the U.N ?
17
posted on
10/31/2002 6:39:03 PM PST
by
USA21
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
iF PEOPLE want the TRUTH look up, the Treaties Compliance Agency that make sure that America Compliance to all Treaties U.N CONTROL AMERICA
18
posted on
10/31/2002 6:54:26 PM PST
by
USA21
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
19
posted on
10/31/2002 7:10:19 PM PST
by
USA21
To: USA21
You must be reading a different article. No one's claiming that US security is dependent upon the UN....just the opposite. The author is stating that the UN's survival is dependent on the US.
No, I don't want us in the UN.
No, I don't think we can act alone in today's world.
Reality bites.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson