[twyn1]

Ummm...not top be jerky about it...but how reliable is "Capital Hill Blue" ?? I always wonder about "unnamed sources"

[Blue Screen of Death]

Ummm...not top be jerky about it...but how reliable is "Capital Hill Blue" ?? I always wonder about "unnamed sources"

Yeah, I am kind of leary on this one. I have trouble with DNC sources high enough to know this turning and leaking this information. I would really like to see it confirmed by something more than an unnamed source.

[concerned about politics]

Ummm...not top be jerky about it...but how reliable is "Capital Hill Blue" ?? I always wonder about "unnamed sources"

Click on the link to check them out. They're a Washington news sourse that stays pretty close to what's going on in DC. They follow up on rumors and ask questions. They do their best. They're small. Sort of a Washington gossip type paper.

[Thud]

Capitol Hill Blue is very reliable.

[alnick]

Ummm...not top be jerky about it...but how reliable is "Capital Hill Blue" ?? I always wonder about "unnamed sources"

I'm with you. While I have no doubt that the pep rally was planned by democrats, I don't necessarily buy the quotes by unnamed sources in this story. They're capable of it, but why would they admit it in terms that make them look sleazy?

I'm always skeptical of unnamed sources.

[Doctor Raoul]

CHB's Doug Thompson is VERY reliable.