To: jobim
Nice job. I actually went in and listened to his speech... and you know what if you were there and you listened to his speech and heard what he said and how he spoke I think your view perhaps may have swayed a little. I personally am niether democratic or republican. I vote for the person,not the party,that would do the best job. Personally I think you missed the point of the rally last night. It was in memory of Mrs. Mink and what she did for us. In my opinion you disrespected her by going and freeping Clinton. The rally was not about Clinton it was about Mink... you should have respected that and let the oprotunity, no matter how great it was, pass. I sorry if I sound upset but I am. Oh and jobim, I assure you that you weren't the only one freeping Clinton.
To: Not Takin Sides
Personally I think you missed the point of the rally last night. It was in memory of Mrs. Mink and what she did for us. In my opinion you disrespected her by going and freeping Clinton. The rally was not about Clinton it was about Mink... Could have fooled me from the news coverage...
38 posted on
10/31/2002 1:34:27 PM PST by
Spyder
To: jobim
GOOD for you, jobim! I think what you did was great, and am always a little bit sad when I hear that x42 has appeared somewhere and nobody was there to remind him that he is a traitor. So your one-person FReep is terrific to read about.
And don't ever let anyone tell you that you did something wrong by FReeping him at an event. He and the party which embraces him is as corrupt and conscienceless as any group that has ever existed. That they will stoop as far as they did in Minnesota this week is proof of that.
The folks who whine that the event was to honor Patsy Mink's memory are as bad as Clinton; they never should have invited the lying, perjuroring, traitor to speak if they wanted to honor Mink. Bringing a disbarred, impeached rapist ex-President to a "memorial" event is reason enough to demonstrate against him (and those who adore him).
But that's just my extremist opinion. Same apologists may differ with that.
Salud!
To: Not Takin Sides
I vote for the person,not the party,that would do the best job.And what exactly, is doing "the best job"?
Taking the earnings and livelihood from one person, and giving it to an undeserving person? Limiting the rights of law-abiding citizens because it makes urban simpletons "feel" safer? Selling nuclear secrets to a communist government who views us as their mortal enemy? Displaying the behavior of a sexual predator?
Yeah - Great job!
48 posted on
10/31/2002 5:36:27 PM PST by
pocat
To: Not Takin Sides
No disrespect to Patsy Mink, or to you, but I am not a "One way conservative". In other words, it is not OK to redistribute wealth as long as you are bringing it home to me. IMO it is always wrong.
Patsy Mink was an out and out communist; a member of the communist party until she became a Democrat to run for office. NOBODY was left of Patsy Mink. True, lots of folks in Hawaii loved her, and with good reason. After all she was great at redistributing wealth in the right direction. So is Dan Inouye. So is Neil Abercrombie and Dan Akaka. They all work hard taking money away from other Americans so they can redistribute it in Hawaii and all of them violate the Constitution of the United States on a daily basis. Yes, lots of people in Hawaii have good things to say about Patsy Mink. It usually goes something like "We needed money for (fill in the blank) and she got it for us from the government." Same with A, A and A. We love them because they bring home the PORK. Don't believe me? Just check thier voting records.
It is always sad when someone passes on. I had hoped that Ms. Mink would live to be defeated in the election fair and square.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson