Skip to comments.
***Lautenberg Gives Un-electable Performance In Debate: Clearly Unfit For Office***
Stardate: 0210.30
Posted on 10/30/2002 7:17:09 PM PST by The Wizard
It's clear why the democrats didn't want The laut to be seen in a debate with a living person.....he was completely un-electable....
It is no longer a question of democrat or republican, it's a question of ability to serve...
I love seniors as a rule, but it was clear tonight that Frank is no longer competent.
Without this debate performance, the democrats could have elected a cardboard cut out of an old senator, and then get someone to serve out the term, but after tonight's debate, it's clear that this man is actually not competent to serve in office.
Forrester is now the only real person running that could actually do the job, unless you want the lib.....
I knew that the laut was old, but there are many old folks who are competent....this poor man is not.
Get out now Mr. lautenberg, before you lose your self esteem
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-153 next last
To: GallopingGhost
bingo
To: YaYa123
Indeed, if this guy is elected he'll be out in weeks
To: The Wizard
He'll be out in weeks, and Torricelli will be back in.
To: Fresh Wind
scary
To: YaYa123
excellent answer
To: Rome2000
bttt
To: Fresh Wind
even the NYT could see it
To: Crispy
almost
To: YaYa123
bttt
To: The Wizard
sorry about the multiple posts Redundancy can be quite catchy as well as contagious.
To: Koblenz
And why is there a Conservative party candidate? I thought that was Frank Perdue, the chicken guy.
To: Jorge
Its the ole mirror test for the democracts, put a mirror under his nose, it fogs up, he's our canidate.
To: PJ-Comix
It's being rerun on C-Span right now. Laut is even worse than I remember.
133
posted on
10/31/2002 3:57:52 AM PST
by
Skooz
To: PJ-Comix
but it was a mistake
To: gulfcoast6
that's how it appears
To: The Wizard
please understand I was shocked....You must have been. It's really unlike you to post a vanity.
To: AppyPappy
this was no "vanity" this was a legit report on what happened...
To: ladyinred; KsSunflower
So the local media made it sound like the Pubbie was an attack dog, and the rat was just brilliant huh? Figures. Oh I forgot the other little bit of analysis! He added:
"Controversy remains in the race, as Forrester still refuses to release his tax returns. Lautenberg has released his. Back to you Kaity."
138
posted on
10/31/2002 5:17:11 AM PST
by
dead
To: Crispy
bttt
To: The Wizard
Forrester should have ads with debate highlights from Laut's awful performance. people did not watch the debate, so we'll bring the debate to them, instead.
This race is not over.
140
posted on
10/31/2002 6:46:22 AM PST
by
mwl1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson