Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Navy Vet
"...Michael New was not defending THAT part of the Constitution..."

So...the Army guys can 'pick-n-chose' what "Parts" of the Constitution to Defend and which parts not to ??

...how utterly laughable....

If they swore to "Defend" it....they swore to all of it. Not just the parts that they agree with.

...no...wait.....

I guess if they were democraps they can do such as that, can't they ?

183 posted on 11/01/2002 8:43:21 AM PST by Coto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Coto
You're not on point. Go back to where you said New's priority should be supporting and defending the Constitution over his obligation to follow orders from his superiors.
186 posted on 11/01/2002 10:06:02 AM PST by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson