Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
There you go again....

"...the one I'm familiar with is silent on the subject. Which clause is it that forbids service with the United Nations..."

Which clause permits it ??

182 posted on 11/01/2002 8:39:16 AM PST by Coto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: Coto
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States..."

Let's face it, other than you loathing for the United Nations, which I won't say I disagree with totally, you have no grounds for saying that New violated his oath. New doesn't have any, either. So deal with it. He took his shot, made his stand, stood up for what be believed in, and paid the price when others determined he was wrong. He doesn't have to accept the decision but he might as well grow up and live with it because, well, because he was wrong.

185 posted on 11/01/2002 9:51:13 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson