Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's not over ^ | 10/29/02 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 10/28/2002 11:41:10 PM PST by kattracks

The headline in last Friday's (Oct. 25) Washington Times said,"Thank God, It's Over." Two suspects in the terror rampage that killed 10 people and wounded three may be in custody, but it's not over. It has only just begun. The Western diplomat murdered in Jordan on Monday is just the latest incident of targeted Americans.

While the Beltway sniper suspects may have acted independently of any known terrorist organization, it is not necessary to be commissioned by a foreign national in order to effectively carry out the wishes of America's enemies.

It is past time to stop worrying about political correctness and the names we might be called - such as intolerant bigoted Islamophobes - and start telling the truth. America's enemies are among us. They are here to kill us. The two men arrested in Maryland are the first wave following the 9/11 airplane hijackings. Surely others will follow, because their religion and history commission them to kill all infidels. Anyone who is a Christian or a Jew, or insufficiently fundamentalist, is fair game. They intend to hunt us down like deer in their scope sights.

How do I know this? Read what they say about themselves and their objectives. In the midst of last week's murderous hostage taking by anti-Russian rebels angry over Moscow's prosecution of the war against Muslim Chechens, a Web site emerged that spelled out the beliefs of those who orchestrated the operation (see latest.cgi?ID=SD43402 for the translation). Featured are articles about Islam's position on how prisoners are to be treated. In"A Guide to the Perplexed about the Permissibility of Killing Prisoners," which appeared in the column"Jihad News from the Land of the Caucasus," the writer offers interpretations of the Koran from Islamic religious scholars:"(1) a polytheist prisoner must be killed. No amnesty may be granted to him, nor can he be ransomed; (2) all infidel polytheists and the People of the Book (i.e. Jews and Christians) are to be killed. They may not be granted amnesty, nor can they be ransomed; (3/4) amnesty and ransom are possible only after killing of a large number of prisoners; (5) the Imam, or someone acting on his behalf, can choose between killing, amnesty, ransom or enslaving the prisoner."

Examples are given regarding the methods the Prophet Muhammad had chosen to kill, grant amnesty or ransom prisoners. He writes that the Prophet Muhammad chose to deal with prisoners in different ways to maximize the benefits to Muslims.

These are the theological precepts apparently practiced by at least some of the people who took hundreds hostage in Moscow last week. Moscow News quoted one of the Chechens as saying,"I swear by God that we are more keen on dying than you are on living." That kind of fanaticism is difficult to stop, but we must make the attempt and soon.

In America, some politically active Muslim groups again decry murderous acts done in the name of their religion. How many more of these acts will be tolerated before we wake up and realize our enemies are playing us for fools and that their sole allegiance is to a violent, vengeful deity who demands his followers to kill everyone who disagrees with their interpretation of him? I do not doubt there are peaceful Muslims, but they aren't the ones with the guns and the explosives. How does one tell the difference?

It does not improve the safety of Americans for our leaders to spout bromides about this supposedly"peaceful religion." How would we react if, instead of one or two snipers mowing down people at will in the Washington, D.C., area, a dozen or more simultaneously turned as many towns into killing fields? It wouldn't take much - just a car, a gun, a co-conspirator - and terror would sweep nationwide. The U.S. economy would surely tank, which is a stated goal of Al Qaeda.

A panel on domestic security, headed by former Sens. Warren Rudman and Gary Hart, concludes the country has become complacent about terrorism and is vulnerable to a catastrophic terrorist attack. The White House and Congress are chided in the report for failing to enact measures to defend the nation. Apparently some politicians care more about their political lives than they do about the rest of us who might die.

Contact Cal Thomas | Read his biography

©2002 Tribune Media Services

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events

1 posted on 10/28/2002 11:41:10 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1
2 posted on 10/28/2002 11:43:27 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Two suspects in the terror rampage that killed 10 people and wounded three may be in custody, but it's not over.

Cal Thomas recognizes a probe when he sees one.

3 posted on 10/29/2002 12:15:28 AM PST by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I agree. Politically correct nonsense is just that - nonsense. Who elects the politically correct police? Who elects the ones who determine "what" is politically correct?

IMHO the decisions as to what is or is not politically correct appears to come from the extreme left who have an agenda. To promote their agenda - they decide something will be politically incorrect and use the media to push this designation.

I do notice it is becoming politically incorrect to suggest that muslims believe as their Koran teaches - kill the infidels and nonbelievers.

I need a document showing all the politically incorrect items I am supposed to uphold. They are all beginning to run together and it seems I just need to assume that any opinion I hold is surely politically incorrect and must be stifled.

Out with opinions based on common sense, morals, righteousness, respect, truth, conservatism, religious beliefs and in with the new politically correct opinions for public dissemination.

What happened to freedom of speech and when did we turnover that freedom to the "politically correct unelected, unnamed designators". How easily they have done away with one of our civil rights and they are not even elected, nominated and confirmed or designated as a government office.

Funny also that we constantly hear complaints of the Department of Homeland Security, the Patriot Act and Ashcroft as the proponents of destroying our civil rights while we willingly give them away our freedom of speech because the media tells us what we can and cannot speak of.

4 posted on 10/29/2002 1:36:24 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
Should be - willingly give away our freedom of speech because the media tells us what we can and cannot speak of.
5 posted on 10/29/2002 1:40:01 AM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
This is for you.
6 posted on 10/29/2002 3:19:41 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson