Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this a Missle being fired at an Airliner?(YES)
FOX 23 News ^ | 10/28/02 | FOX

Posted on 10/28/2002 10:06:20 PM PST by seeker41

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: Axenolith
Now, it could be a demon or other minion of Satan, he is prince of the aerial host for now and that thing does look kinda ectoplasmic...

Definitely other-dimensional. You think it was carrying Greys or Greens?




41 posted on 10/28/2002 10:49:04 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Ok, ok, I did a stop action on the vid and that frame (behind the cloud) IS interesting. It >seems< to rule out something close to the camera, but I think it could be explained as an illusion.

Also interesting is that the object appears to be the same configuration throughout the video, i.e 4 fins, length, etcetera. Usually an image of a bug close to the camera will change slightly frame to frame.

BUT let's get a grip here and try to rule a few things out.

The ISS would >probably< appear much smaller, and it's location when the video was shot is easy enought to check. I'll do it online when I'm done with this reply.

A missle fired at the plane wouldn't appear that big unless it was close to the camera. The missles seeker posted would only be DOTS, unless they were close to the camera and if that's the case it couldn't have been fired AT the plane.

There IS a possibility the object is a model rocket, but again it would have had to have been close to the camera, so close the cameraman would have seen the launch or otherwise noticed it.

Assuming the object was behind the cloud, and we don't know the altitude of the cloud but lets says it's over 2000 feet, it would have to have been MASSIVE....hundreds of feet long.

That's why I'm sticking with the bug or stone illusion. Or as I said before, the flying moose that bit my sister once.

prisoner6

42 posted on 10/28/2002 10:50:52 PM PST by prisoner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
I'll let you know what he says ASAP. But, it won't be until tomorrow...
he's asleep.;o)
43 posted on 10/28/2002 10:51:04 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Not a missile. None has ever been reported to cause any kind of explosion. Plus, the fins always seem to move or spin when examined more closely.
44 posted on 10/28/2002 10:51:59 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Greys or Greens, either way they're to be assumed hostile (and that includes loser governors). Little trailer park resident abducting, rectum and eyeball coring bastards have a shellacing coming if you ask me!!!
45 posted on 10/28/2002 10:52:30 PM PST by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
See i have never belived in UFOs or the rod thingys. The video interested me only because it looked like a missle being shot at a plane. I saw the photos of the Cave of Sparrows and don't know what to think.
46 posted on 10/28/2002 10:54:36 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Ntsc is 29.97 frames a second.
47 posted on 10/28/2002 10:56:19 PM PST by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
Assuming the object was behind the cloud, and we don't know the altitude of the cloud but lets says it's over 2000 feet, it would have to have been MASSIVE....hundreds of feet long.

The videographer on FOX stated the thing was hundreds of feet long and was moving extremely fast. I want to say 7 frames per second, but not sure.

48 posted on 10/28/2002 10:56:32 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Oh I forgot, he said it seemed to be at about 5000 feet up.
49 posted on 10/28/2002 10:58:00 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
"Assuming the object was behind the cloud, and we don't know the altitude of the cloud but lets says it's over 2000 feet, it would have to have been MASSIVE....hundreds of feet long."

That's very logical, but I will wait until I hear what my husband says before I draw any conclusions.

"...the flying moose that bit my sister once."

The poor dear...
;o)

50 posted on 10/28/2002 11:00:01 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Far as rods go, I'll keep an open mind and allow for the possibility that they are some atmospheric equivalent of a jellyfish composed primarily of electromagnetic energy and differential amounts of trace gasses...
51 posted on 10/28/2002 11:00:28 PM PST by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
That missile has got to be as large as the airplane as it flew through the clouds and was very high up. Secondly there is no vapor trail coming out the back.
52 posted on 10/28/2002 11:01:12 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
Fox videographer accidentally shoots image of what he believes may be a UFO. The mysterious image now has the FBI involved. Brandon Mowry, videographer for Fox 23 Albany

Gleened this off the FOXNEWS site.

53 posted on 10/28/2002 11:02:07 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Yes, BUT remember the videographer also mentioned he didn't notice the object until he was screening the video. He's making the length assumption based on the same data we are looking at.

There is another possibility I forgot to mention. Isn't it about time for Art bell to "retire" again? Maybe it's just a PR stunt. I wouldn't put it past him espcially considering the time of year.

prisoner6

54 posted on 10/28/2002 11:02:33 PM PST by prisoner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

there is a website that shows you how to make these. you need video, not film. I think its a bug.
55 posted on 10/28/2002 11:02:41 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
"The videographer on FOX stated the thing was hundreds of feet long and was moving extremely fast."

Yes!!! I heard him say that!

I was busy, and was listening with one ear, but I did hear that!

56 posted on 10/28/2002 11:03:32 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Wow 5000 ft! How would he know that?

I suspect it was right at the end of the camera, in his CCD. That or we have UFOs and/or SAMs bothering bats too.
57 posted on 10/28/2002 11:03:42 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
Secondly there is no vapor trail coming out the back.

Is that significant? Do you think it was a missle and if "yes" why is the media not talking more about this event.

58 posted on 10/28/2002 11:03:48 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod
If it is only a bug, why is the FBI involved now?
59 posted on 10/28/2002 11:04:37 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Thanks for verifing. Sometimes I hesitate to post things b/c folks try to rationalize things away. I know what I saw and heard.;)
60 posted on 10/28/2002 11:07:02 PM PST by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson