Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun-Toting Students Show More Risky Behaviors
Reuters Health via Yahoo ^ | 10-28-02 | Alison McCook

Posted on 10/28/2002 12:58:34 PM PST by Pharmboy

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Approximately 4% of US college students own guns, and those that do are more likely than others to engage in certain high-risk behaviors, such as binge drinking, new study findings show.

Dr. Matthew Miller of Harvard University in Boston and his colleagues found that gun-owning college students tend to drink higher amounts of alcohol at a time, and when doing so, are more likely than others to have unprotected sex and run-ins with police.

Other high-risk behaviors more commonly noted in gun-owners included driving while drunk and using crack and cocaine. Students were also more likely to own guns if they were attending college in a part of the country where gun ownership was more common in the general population.

Miller told Reuters Health that the study did not assess why gun-owners are more likely to show high-risk behaviors in college than those without guns, but he speculated that this tendency "may reflect a disposition to both own guns and engage in risky behavior."

Alternatively, the researcher suggested that some gun-owners may become "emboldened" by their weapons, and may consequently act in ways they would not if they didn't own guns. However, he noted that the behaviors seen in the study--binge drinking and unprotected sex, for example--are not commonly seen as behaviors of an emboldened person.

Miller and his team obtained their findings from questionnaires completed by more than 10,000 undergraduate students from 119 colleges throughout the US.

The authors discovered that 4.3% of college students--and 8% of male students--said they brought guns to college. Half of gun-owners said they purchased a firearm for protection.

The authors discovered that gun-owners in college were most often white men who lived off campus with a significant other.

Gun-owning college students also tended to have more exposure to guns and gun violence than those who did not own firearms, the authors report in the recent issue of the Journal of American College Health. For example, students who owned guns for protection were more likely to be threatened with a gun at college.

Students who hailed from states in which many people own guns--such as states in the East South Atlantic region, where 38% of households have guns--were more than three times as likely as those from New England, where gun ownership is rare, to bring a gun to college. They were also more than twice as likely to have been threatened by a firearm at college.

"I suspect that many administrators are surprised that, on average, across the US 4% of students have guns," Miller told Reuters Health in an interview.

The researcher said that he hopes these results inspire administrators to investigate further what compels students to bring guns to college, and how this tendency might have an impact on violence committed on college campuses.

SOURCE: Journal of American College Health 2002.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; gungrabbers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: trebb
The kids are yanking these clymer's chains.
41 posted on 10/28/2002 2:45:01 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Miller told Reuters Health that the study did not assess why gun-owners are more likely to show high-risk behaviors in college than those without guns, but he speculated that this tendency "may reflect a disposition to both own guns and engage in risky behavior."

I stand in awe - in AWE - of this man's intellect!

42 posted on 10/28/2002 2:45:43 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
10mm porn


43 posted on 10/28/2002 2:46:08 PM PST by BlessingInDisguise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

I wonder how many gun-owning students felt the questionairre was a silly invasion of their privacy, perhaps even a fishing expedition to find out who illegally held guns on campus, and either lied or threw it away?

44 posted on 10/28/2002 2:48:00 PM PST by ChuteTheMall GawdSortaMount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Here's the a partial abstract from the Journal of American College Health:

"Guns at college Matthew Miller; Journal of American College Health; Jul 1999; Vol. 48, Iss. 1; pg. 7, 6 pgs

Abstract:
A random sample of more than 15,000 undergraduate students from 130 4-year colleges answered a mailed questionnaire concerning firearm possession. Approximately 3.5[percent] of the sampled students reported they had a working firearm at college. Students with guns were more likely to be male, White, or Native American; to binge drink and need to start the day with alcohol; to be members of a ..."

Now, this article is from 1999 and it's news today? Or did this guy do the study over? Notice the article say 3.5% of students said they had a working firearm at College and they include Indians with whites. What happened to them in the article?

45 posted on 10/28/2002 2:59:40 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
So now gun ownership leads to binge drinking and higher rates of unprotected sex.

Huh? Not in my experience...

Of course this "study" is academic bilgewater of the lowest grade. Peer-review should have chopped it up into Julienne fries, but, as this is the squishy "sciences," they'll get away with it...

46 posted on 10/28/2002 3:09:06 PM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aeronca
EXCELLENT points but haven't recent surveys said that kids are well adjusted who are put in daycare at a young age? We know otherwise.........
47 posted on 10/28/2002 3:14:50 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Absolutely!!
48 posted on 10/28/2002 3:15:19 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: metesky
The only reason that Dr. Matthew Miller of Harvard University in Boston and his colleagues think that gun ownership is low in NE is because they think Boston and Martha's Vineyard comprise all of NE.

I was kind of wondering if the good Doctor had excluded Vermont, New Hamphire and Maine (to say the least) from New England.

By the way, it was reported today that 222 moose had been taken in the four day VT moose hunting season. Perhaps they were downed with evil SUV's since guns are so rare up here.

49 posted on 10/28/2002 3:19:22 PM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
"...So now gun ownership leads to binge drinking and higher rates of unprotected sex. Ooookayyy....

I can hear the bar chippies now...

"Is that a .44 Magnum with an 8" bull barrel in your pocket?

Or are you just glad to see me?"

50 posted on 10/28/2002 3:30:48 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
students who owned guns for protection were more likely to be threatened with a gun at college.

This is absolute nonsense.

I can see you aren't real familiar with the esoteric art of Zen statistical analysis. You see: if you build it, they will come... if you don't demand a cure for aids, you will contract it... Opposition to homosexuality means you are one... you must support welfare or you will become poor... Up is really down and left is really right, if you are but deep enough to comprehend it. Liberal logic is far too deep to make sense.

51 posted on 10/28/2002 3:34:46 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
If the real number is not higher than that I will stand on my head and whistle Dixie in the middle of times square with a daisy stuck in my rear.
52 posted on 10/28/2002 4:51:51 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grut
I stand in awe - in AWE - of this man's intellect!


I am shocked, shocked I say.
53 posted on 10/28/2002 4:57:34 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I can see where this is headed. another perverted porno-gun thread. so be it.

From gunchicks.com


54 posted on 10/28/2002 5:05:38 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
222 moose

Is that a new wildcat I haven't heard about yet? And where can I get one?!?!?!?

55 posted on 10/28/2002 5:31:08 PM PST by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Isn't this from about a year ago? Guess they saw the opportunity and dragged it out again...
56 posted on 10/28/2002 5:49:42 PM PST by Pat Bateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
Thanks for pointing that out (the year of the article, 1999, that is). Very interesting observations.
57 posted on 10/28/2002 5:51:14 PM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Let's see the raw data, including all questions and responses.

...We'll never see it, of course.
58 posted on 10/28/2002 5:53:43 PM PST by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pat Bateman
Evidently yes. Jabba had just pointed that out.
59 posted on 10/28/2002 5:54:15 PM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson