Throwing people who don't agree with you out, are you? Naughty, naughty, that's not what JimRob swore this place was about, per post #157 above. But go right ahead, but better remender Newtons Law about equal and opposite reactions, as well as the old sayings that when you get in a fight with a pig, the pig loves it. And the one about how it's really, REALLY stupid to sling mud at people who work in a racket where they buy ink by the barrellful.
And, just so you don't have to continue to wallow in your ignorance, slander is the spoken denigration or obliquey of another- when written, such activity is classified as libel- unless truthful or factual, and I believe you'll find that I'd have no problem proving the accuracy of what I wrote should I need to.
So when you refer to me as a *creep* you're exactly correct, because I do indeed give some people the creeps, such as the US Senator whose political asperations for a vice-presidential nomination I helped crush by authioring a detailed account of his role in the coverup of the murder of his father's mistress. And there was no charge of Libel filed; I both documented my claims and wrote them veery carefully.
But if you were to say that I have the creeps, which is a physical condition resulting from a calcium deficiency in sheep, that would indeed be libelous, and a matter for which I could bring a lawsuit- if I wasn't too busy laughing myself silly and framing your comment with others lots less original.
So you'll understand that's why I had to explain the difference to you, assuming that you're an ignorant cretin.
-archy-/-
This has nothing to do with disagreement on the issue at hand, it's about your vile slander - and, in case you missed it, the poster Spiff, with whom I have disagreed on this thread, also called you on it.
believe you'll find that I'd have no problem proving the accuracy of what I wrote should I need to.
OK, let's see your proof that JimRob and the moderators are taking narco-dollars. I can't wait to see this one.