Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckett
We have never called for an independent Taiwan.

We have also never stated we do not support it.

That is novel. Brand new for a POTUS to have ever said.

The phrasing used used in policy documents has always fudged the issue.

Yes. This time he used no fudge in explicitly siding with the Chinese communists.

This was as bad as what Clinton did.

Worse because George Bush should know better.

There is no explaining this away or getting around it. It is a major mistake on President Bush's part and will harm his presidency.

116 posted on 10/26/2002 8:49:26 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: tallhappy; sit-rep; tdadams; Jeff Head
No need for Taiwan to declare "independence"

Taiwan does not have to declare Independence. Taiwan is independent.

When we say we support only a peaceful resolution to the conflict, we mean that we support Taiwan's de facto independence. To directly confront the PRC's delusions is not the way to resolve the conflict peacefully.

Only Taiwan's own appeasers can give up her independence. The United Nations will never protect Taiwan's sovereignty. Only the United States can.

197 posted on 10/26/2002 12:56:48 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson