Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I do extend thoughts and prayers to the family of Mr. Wellstone. I'm just asking a political question here...anyone know the answer?
1 posted on 10/25/2002 2:16:18 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
As far as I'm aware, 50-49 isn't a tie.
2 posted on 10/25/2002 2:18:08 PM PDT by DallasJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Even if you could, I think only a Democrat would.

Dan

3 posted on 10/25/2002 2:18:15 PM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The Minority Leader of the Senate has no such powers.

Lott wouldn't if he could. Only the appointment of a Republican, or one that would caucus with the repubs, would make any difference and as the Talent election is a replacement of an appontee, nothing on this will happen until after Nov 5 and the results of the Missouri election and Ventura's decision to appoint or not appoint an interim Senator for Minnisota is settled.

4 posted on 10/25/2002 2:24:07 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
No - It wouldn't work in the real world because teh "tie-breaker" vote is for LEGISLATION, not procedureal issues.

Senate leadership is a good-ole-boys ritual that votes for THE single Senate leader.

Then THAT ONE PERSON assign committee chairs by party.

Then THOSE committee chairs DECIDE (on their own, actually led by the party chairman, or Hillary - as the case may be) what legistlation and judges do.

Cheney CAN'T vote until and unless there is a "tie" on legislation.
6 posted on 10/25/2002 2:34:42 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
And Jesse can screw up this sudden upset by appointing an interim Democrat or confuse the whole process by appointing a maverick Independent.
7 posted on 10/25/2002 2:36:30 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Trent Lott is a wussy boy nerd. I have absolutely no confidence in this man as a leader. For a few years now he has been minority leader and has done what? And absolutely nothing forcefully. Get real leaders in the positions of house and senate leaders not these kiss asses. Hastert and Lott do nothing but try to get along. Neither could lead me to water if I were thirsty.
8 posted on 10/25/2002 2:38:32 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The Senate at this moment has 49 practical Democrats, 1 independent, and 49 Republicans. Since the tie-breaking vote goes to Cheney, Lott could be elected majority leader if the Senate were in session.

And that one Independent caucuses with the Democrats. For organization purposes, it is 50-49 Democrats.

9 posted on 10/25/2002 2:41:06 PM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Jeffords will vote with the Democrats or switch formally. Then there's always Lincoln Chaffey, who said he'd switch to the Dems if the Republicans got a majority.

For your plan to work it would take another plane crash.

10 posted on 10/25/2002 2:48:14 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I can't stand Trent Lott!
11 posted on 10/25/2002 4:39:40 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Lott would be out of his mind to try anything like that before the election. When Jeffords jumped, the media all cheered. But if the Republicans pulled a fast one, they would be hounded and pounded for the next fifty years. The media would love it. Better than Watergate!

Time enough to sort this out after November 5.
12 posted on 10/25/2002 6:45:43 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Trent Lott is a eunuch - even if he could call the Senate back into session to effectuate such a change, he would rather sing with the boys - he is a worthless piece of crap.
13 posted on 10/25/2002 6:54:48 PM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
It's time for the Senate President, Dick Cheney, to assume full-time Senate duties until the next Congress is sworn in.
15 posted on 10/25/2002 8:06:20 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
No. Only the President can call Congress into special session.
17 posted on 10/26/2002 6:15:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Lott sounds fuzzy, dull, and out-of-touch. GOP needs a sharp and forceful voice, not Lott.

Dashle is full of crap, but his speaking style and passion run circles around the hapless Lott.

22 posted on 10/27/2002 4:38:29 AM PST by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Cheney gets a vote on ties on legislation, not on reorganization.
26 posted on 10/31/2002 6:58:24 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
The Senate is meeting Pro Forma currently. It is scheduled to be in regular session on Nov. 12......
31 posted on 10/31/2002 7:40:28 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson