Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I saw the press conference. Absentee ballots cast for Wellstone will be counted as invalid votes. A supplement will be added to the general election ballot with the replecemnet's name. Any ballot that is still cast for Wellstone would be invalid, thus a repeat of Missouri 2000 can not happen in Minnesota. The issue still has to be decided by the Minnesota Supreme Court, but there is a consensus among the parties involved (DFL, GOP, IP, Ventura Administration).

This also means that the Democrats no longer hold a majority in the Senate.

1 posted on 10/25/2002 2:03:04 PM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HapaxLegamenon
Two thoughts, 1-He was going to lose, ergo does anyone believe hanky-panky? 2- dems know that pubbies can't beat dead people, right Ashcroft?
2 posted on 10/25/2002 2:08:24 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
Watch out for this: people who are being told that their absentee ballots are invalid may now try to (a) re-request NEW absentee ballots; or (b) vote on November 5th at a precinct. Both actions would be illegal double-voting.
3 posted on 10/25/2002 2:09:02 PM PDT by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
... This also means that the Democrats no longer hold a majority in the Senate ...
Ventura could appoint a Democrat to replace Wellstone, right?

And what is it about Democrats and rockstars and aircraft? I mean, what are your thoughts about how Democrats seem to fall from the sky like rocks?
4 posted on 10/25/2002 2:10:07 PM PDT by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
The Minnesota laws on this subject are at http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/204B/13.html and http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/204B/41.html

As you can see, the RATs can't "pull a Carnahan." They'll have to replace Wellstone on the ballot and the replacement will have about a week to campaign against Coleman.
5 posted on 10/25/2002 2:17:33 PM PDT by sampai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
The Minnesota laws on this subject are at http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/204B/13.html and http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/204B/41.html

As you can see, the RATs can't "pull a Carnahan." They'll have to replace Wellstone on the ballot and the replacement will have about a week to campaign against Coleman.
6 posted on 10/25/2002 2:18:55 PM PDT by sampai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
This also means that the Democrats no longer hold a majority in the Senate.

They have not technically been in a majority since the end of the 103rd Congress. They had a plurality of 50 votes plus 1 independent since Jeffords switched parties just five months after starting a new term to which he was elected as a Republican.

7 posted on 10/25/2002 2:33:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
Any ballot that is still cast for Wellstone would be invalid

Now who here actually believes that this is going to hold water???

8 posted on 10/25/2002 2:39:27 PM PDT by pbranham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon
The Wellstone legacy:


18 posted on 10/26/2002 5:09:26 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson