Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckett
I think you have to differentiate between the positivism of Comte and the logical positivism of Schlick, Carnap, and a whole gang of others. Comte's positivism was certainly empirical, but logical positivism is a much more rigorous and formal system of logic and language than Comte's (and Ernst Mach's) positivism. It's probably fair to think of logical positivism as an offshoot of Comte, but it also relies heavily on the development of formal logic in the late 19'th and early 20'th centuries, particularly the work of Frege, Russell, Peano, and Wittgenstein - which, of course, Comte wasn't around to see ;)
203 posted on 10/27/2002 10:25:50 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
You mean the Vienna Circle --- ok. Yeah I guess they changed the name from positivism to logical positivism, as I recall.
204 posted on 10/27/2002 10:35:07 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson