What, are you crazy or something?
Don't you know the definition of a fanatic?
Someone who won't drop it, and won't change the subject.
you see, there are two sluts, err, slits and . . .
Probably, but the closure would make the whole argument worthwhile--and tell me that you are someone who can be argued with, rather than a moving target who slyly slips from position to position to avoid clarity.
Someone who won't drop it, and won't change the subject.
Why don't you two toss a coin, and decide whether I am constantly changing the subject, or won't drop a subject?
There have been two promenent discussions in this thread I've tried to participate in: whether the Law of Identity is inviolate and ubuquitous, and whether the Gospels were the chief source of Western anti-semitism. If you will, between you, decide whether I am constantly changing the subject or constantly sticking to the subject, I will offer my profound apologies for whichever behavior was incorrect.