[Michael Barnes]

Before I begin, allow me to firmly fit my tin-foil hat..*ahem*

I believe, the reason the sniper acted the way he (they) did was due to "cover-up". The "word" was not getting out that this is terrorism. Witness LAX a few months back. A (damn) arab shoots up the Israeli airlines both. I mean, C'mon, what the hell are we supposed to thing? But Nooooooooooooo, It wasn't terrorist related. Witness our very own loving administration spouting off very soon after 9/11 that everlasting phrase; Islam is a religion of peace.

If the populace is not lied to, if it's not controlled, a bloodbath would result. Problem I see is, a boiler maker is in the mix. How many more Mohhamed's are we gonna take??

[Michael Barnes]

both ='s booth.....sorry

[The Red Zone]

Why don't Islamic terrorists want you to know that the terror is in the name of Allah? The other Islamic invasions of history were not covert.

[Lizard_King]

I would disagree with your conclusion, not your premises tho. I think the media is coordinating a vast cover up of Muslim organized terror, however I don't think the fear of retaliation against Muslims is realistic. If it didn't happen after 9/11, it will never happen. Americans, by and large, are not bloodthirsty or stupid enough to blame a whole group of people for the actions of a subset within that group.

I don't know what motivation the media has for this. Perhaps the evidence about Islamic militant conspiracies is so great they fear the public would go mad from paranoia were it to go mainstream.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

I agree with your points. Keep posting - don't worry about the speling erors ;-).