Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
Dorm student may not even if they are from that county."

Sweet, if they were from that county they would have to sneak home and vote where they usually do. Believe me, I certainly would not want the 7,000 kids at UAM voting for local ordinances in our 9,000 person city. It would be a huge screwup. I see the reason for the law.

However I am concerned about the ruling. I don't see how he can screw with the rolls this close to the election. He could in fact disinfranchise a voter and that is really bad.

I suspect this ruling will be overturned and a new one issued, but the fact is that the law will stand.

193 posted on 10/24/2002 10:47:32 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: wirestripper
" I don't see how he can screw with the rolls this close to the election."

That, coupled with the fact that the law is not being equally applied is my concern. You can't have it both ways, but that is Rat style. I'm betting that the only reason that even the Rats in other parts of the state are hollering about this decision is because they DON'T want to see that law enforced statewide since MOST college students pad THEIR numbers and they realize that a handful of conservative students are irrelevant in the big picture.

195 posted on 10/24/2002 10:52:13 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson