Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
The problem that I see with the judge's decision is that he ordered the roles purged of anyone from the college address. The point is, it was illegal to put them on the rolls in the first place.

How did that happen? Voters on a roll have to be assigned to a distict and given a polling place. If the address has no district or polling place then they should never have been placed on the rolls.

Also, I wonder if there are some year round residents, like caretakers etc.

I cannot see how he can purge without giving a legal remedy to those who may not be registered under another address previously.

This would in fact be disinfranchisement as it is to late to register now. Correct?

185 posted on 10/24/2002 10:26:56 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: wirestripper
"I cannot see how he can purge without giving a legal remedy to those who may not be registered under another address previously.

This would in fact be disinfranchisement as it is to late to register now. Correct?"

That was exactly the point.

199 posted on 10/24/2002 11:06:15 PM PDT by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson