To: Dave Dilegge
Hi Dave,
It's the subtleties (sp) that you have to read into. Teenager yes, but Virgina and Alabama execute under age 18, Maryland does not.
Maryland is where they will be prosecuted, and I belive that anyone that can distinguish between right and wrong, and a 17 year old can, needs to be held acocuntable for their actions. Period.
Thanks for the reply, though.
14 posted on
10/24/2002 12:40:56 PM PDT by
Sonar5
To: Sonar5
I get you and I agree with your point - just get disturbed sometimes with knee-jerk reactions here as they often get copied, posted, and warped on TOS sites. Also, I apoligize - you did not post this under breaking news - my bad.
16 posted on
10/24/2002 12:43:31 PM PDT by
VaMarVet
To: Sonar5
Please ad CNNs Talk Back Live,,,,,,what er name Neville has an attorney on here focusing on 17yr old, 17,17,17.................
Then a defense attorney comes on and starts looking after Malvo's victim rights. He is a child you know /sarcasm off/
"He could be under influence of a dominant adult."
To: Sonar5
At least the radio station (WTOP) I'm listening to is referring to them by their EVIL three/full names.
To: Sonar5
Maryland is where they will be prosecuted I see no reason why they couldn't also stand trial in the other jurisdictions for the crimes committed there. Maryland shouldn't be allowed to prosecute for the killings in VA and AL -- and if the 17-year old only gets one year in Maryland, he better pray he never gets spotted in (or extradited to) VA or AL, since those crimes will not have been tried yet.
21 posted on
10/24/2002 12:47:03 PM PDT by
kevkrom
To: Sonar5
Maryland is where they will be prosecutedMaryland is where the will be prosecuted first, but I can't imagine that the local DAs in the Virginia jurisdictions will pass up a chance to also prosecute.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson