EBUCK
I own an original Colt Commando (a/k/a the "XM-177" or "shorty") and also a Fabrique Nationale M4 (and yes, I own them both legally.) While I appreciate the quality and workmanship from the old Colt days - FN is currently making a better weapon.
Believe me, I would rather see the Colt's Firearms' quality from back in the old days, along with the "Rampant Colt" logo, in and on the new weapons. There just seems to be something wrong with the idea of FN making a rifle made famous by Colt.
Just my opinion: While I appreciate the fact that the Corp wants to maintain its own image, I don't think the M16A4 is the best choice. Yes, I know every Marine is a rifleman, but the advantages of the M4 carbine's smaller size would seem to outweigh the often claimed accuracy benefit (not mentioned, and actually denied in the article) of the extra 5.5 inches of barrel and the full stock on the M16A4. I find the statement of more malfunctions with the M4 carbine completely unbelievable. I have personally taught classes and run numerous courses (still do... it's a living) on the M4 and have not found them to be any less reliable than the M16. What I have found to be the case is this: The full size M16 in any variation (A1, A2, A3, or A4) is rather cumbersome in M.O.U.T., especially when trying to move in and out of buildings by means other than a door. The M4 and the Commando are real sweethearts in a close quarters situation and anytime you need to "get small" in order to move in and out of an area.
Okay - I coming down off the soapbox now...
Stay armed,
Raven6
God made man, Sam Colt made him equal.
But didn't I see Senator Dodd on c-span the other day saying how he didn't care how many lawsuits were brought against the firearms manufacturers in his home state, those jobs don't matter anyhow?