Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting night! Still shaking my head at the 3rd party ratty rat democrat like guy!
1 posted on 10/22/2002 7:16:41 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TLBSHOW
When I think of relaxing gun laws, I think of 155mm Howitzers and such. The last time I looked, the highest law in the land says that if you can carry it, it's legal!
2 posted on 10/22/2002 7:24:45 PM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Tonight at Suco State College of New York

Suco... like Sucker or Suckee. What's with these people? Don't they understand that we cannot depend on government to protect us from terrorists who are already here waiting in the bushes to kill us ALL?

3 posted on 10/22/2002 7:26:20 PM PDT by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
They should be passing out M-16's to any law-abiding citizen who asks for one. This would be the quickest way to deal with the wacko. As we've seen, the police have not had sufficient lead time to pin this guy down. If every law-abiding citizen in the beltway had a gun, this guy would go away, either by realizing that everyone is armed, or at the hands of the citizenry shooting his worthless full of holes.
4 posted on 10/22/2002 7:29:20 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
The terrorists are coming the terrorists are coming & they are killing people
Quick we must disarm the people...before they stop them
6 posted on 10/22/2002 9:52:09 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
the conservative candidate and Second Amendment supporter

I used to live in his district. I can assure you that Boelhert is NOT a conservative and NOT a 2nd Amendment supporter.

19 posted on 10/23/2002 8:29:31 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Once again for the hearing and otherwise existentially challenged- THIS IS MIDEASTERN TERRORISM- the recent news about children at risk and especially BODY BAGS are totally consistent with this theory. Further body bags is a term the regimes in the ME love to use as a reminder of our Vietnam experience. This is a term of WAR, not psychosis. As to the $ issue, a diversion, althougth we all know that they may be running low on cash and need adequate funding ( ask the UN about that when it comes to Palestinian terror).

By the way, the media are giving this all the exposure of an Al Queda Cell at work. My bet is that these are some buddies of the earlier bombers of the TTT. After all, was there not alot of target practise arond Lakawanaand was not George Tennet very nervous lately.

Think for yourselves as the Government and local enforcement have no current interest in fessing up to it directly.

21 posted on 10/23/2002 8:32:28 AM PDT by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
There is a law in some states, I don't know if it is also available at the Federal level. The law allows the Governor or some such to declaire a particular person an "Outlaw", not exactly sure of the term here, and when that person is declaired such, anyone can wack him with no fear of prosocution. That person becomes a free fire zone. Is this an option in Maryland and Virginia? Has it been done?

Think about this. You are a conceal carry person. The sniper is hiding in the bushes near you. He shoots someone. He picks up his gear and heads off to get in his van. You wack him. You then get arested for shooting the SOB because he was no longer a threat to you or anyone else. In NC you cannot shoot a person who is not directly involved in causing harm to you or another person. The killer is traveling away from you and not pointing his firearm at you or anyone else. He simply can walk off and go on his merry way. There is no such thing as citizens arrest in NC. If you wack him, you have commited murder.

22 posted on 10/23/2002 8:34:42 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Instead he calls for making gun laws we already have much more effective.

Shill. Just declared himself such. Any true supporters of the second amendment would be against all gun laws, "effective" or otherwise. Arguments like his play right into the hands of gun-grabbers. After all, if the laws on the books can be "effective" at reducing crime, then more laws should be more effective. No conservative should waste his vote on this joker.

Picture yourself voting for a candidate who says, "We don't need more restrictions on free speech, we just need to make sure the ones we have are more effective."

30 posted on 10/23/2002 10:02:55 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson