[WRhine]

We don't care whether you have confidence in Bush or not; this is NOT the thread for that. Lord knows there are a million other ones on here you can vent that on.

It is relavent to this thread and I don't care what you think.

[Howlin]

Oh, I know you don't care what anybody thinks; that's why you post the same thing on virtually every single thread on this forum.

Got agenda?

[David]

"'We don't care whether you have confidence in Bush or not; this is NOT the thread for that. Lord knows there are a million other ones on here you can vent that on.'

It is relavent to this thread and I don't care what you think."

I agree. I think a part of the debate will come down to our form of government. The preamble to the Constitution states that one of the purposes of our government is "to provide for the common defense". Our existing government is no longer doing that for reasons related to politically correct thought; the imposition by various minorities of directed voting power to impede the constitutional course of government; and other considerations related to international policy goals such as a new world order which do not have the interest of United States citizens as their first priority.

Bush is a big part of that problem, as is the existing perversion of the democratic process. I believe we will have a constitutional crisis before the end of the current administration and attention ought to be directed here, as well as in other domestic political circles about what to do about this state of affairs.

The government's response to the sniper, as to other domestic attacks, has been to declare war on American citizens instead of on the enemy. Bush is responsible. We need to do it some other way.