Which was exactly Pardek's point, of course.
We've known for four years that Dick Morris has a horrible accuracy rate as an Election Pundit.
Morris predicted that the GOP would gain 35-40 seats in 1998. They didn't. If memory serves, the GOP lost a few seats.
Morris failed horribly as an Election Pundit then. So why should we believe him now?
Hopefully, you now comprehend Pardek's argument. Glad I could help.