To: ag2000jon
By no means am I an expert. It seems to me that if the voice is digitally altered, it would be possible to digitally undo the effect. Adding random noise to the distortion might make it at least difficult, if not impossible, to determine the original voice. The companies that make the distortion devices probably also sell the decoders to the Feds... who knows?
To: Quicksilver
It's amazing that all this media coverage and LE involvement and schools closed and parents missing work to stay home with the kids, and all we caught were two illegals. Wow. More expensive than buying them first class tickets back to where they came from.
Don't think whomever is making demands/deals with moose, doesn't know they'll promise him/them anything but, they intend to win in the end. So, we (the citizens) have to go through this stuff anyway. Just don't understand.
To: Quicksilver
It seems to me that if the voice is digitally altered, it would be possible to digitally undo the effect. I don't think you could unless you knew the algorithm used and posessed a digital copy of the voice before it was translated to analog (which occurs somewhere before the ear piece on the phone).
162 posted on
10/21/2002 9:21:43 PM PDT by
Demidog
To: Quicksilver
If it were necessary to "talk" in an untraceable way, the best means would be not to use voice at all, but to use a computer speech synthesizer from a leading software publisher.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson