[Catspaw]

Okay, I'll tell her to set aside her moral values and vote for an adulterer so a pro-abortion candidate doesn't get in. That is what you're saying, isn't it?

[No Truce With Kings]

Okay, I'll tell her to set aside her moral values and vote for an adulterer so a pro-abortion candidate doesn't get in. That is what you're saying, isn't it?

Doesn't hardly seem fair does it? But then again life isn't fair. That is the first rule in life's rule book. (No. 2 is "When in doubt, see rule no. 1.")

But you see, the alternative to choosing the lesser of two evils is choosing the greater of two evils. Either the philaderer or the baby-killer, those are the choices.

Remember what Churchill (a die-hard Red-hater) said when asked to defend his support of the Soviet Union after Hitler invaded it: "If Hitler invaded Hell, I would find a kind word for the Devil." Sometimes that's what you have to do.

[carmelanne]

IMHO Mr.Hutchinson, once upon a time, may have used his position as a minister, moral person and married family man, as a reason for the good citizens of Arkansas to vote for him.

[moneyrunner]

During World War I it is recorded that very senior British intelligence officers would not open German letters that fell into their hands because “Gentlemen do not read other gentlemen’s mail.” They had no problem sending their men across open fields in the face of machine gun fire to die on barbed wire. I see that a certain brand of morality has survived into the new millennium.