[txzman]

'No more Kodak film for me, thank you.'

Ditto for me. At least they did something blatant enough to alert me so that my money can go elsewhere. Fuji is a perfect alternative and is eating Kodak's lunch anyway.

Let's see if we can't help them along into the dumper. (Nothing personal against current Kodak employees - but enough is enough).

[Paulus Invictus]

So why penalize Kodak employes for the management's PC idiocy? The more you use Fuji, the more you help Japan, not American employees! Worse, Kodak has been trying to compete against Fuji for years and Japan makes it nearly impossible by subsidizing Fuji's manufacturing costs. It's hard to beat their prices since they are kept low by the subsidies. Kodak tried to get the US Commerce Dept. to help out, but they refused (another Klintoon anti-American business act).

Kodak has been pressured by "imported" management's policies that never would have been implemented by past Kodak management who were all "up from the ranks" and conservative to the core.

[Chemnitz]

I can't remember buying film. I went digital a long time ago. Film is the buggy whip of the 21st century. Yes, we will need a few rolls of film, but not many. Motion pictures are going digital. Our kids will no longer say, "Did you see the film?" Instead, they will say, "Did you see the NV RAM?"

That said, Kodak is completely wrong. The position is that the gay lobby can rub it in the faces of the employees but they cannot object. That is not free speech.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

E-Mail Questions or Comments to Kodak