Hmmmm.
1 posted on
10/20/2002 6:14:06 PM PDT by
ninenot
To: ninenot
Just one more reason to get a CCW permit.
2 posted on
10/20/2002 6:16:04 PM PDT by
OXENinFLA
To: ninenot
ping for future reference!
To: Thornwell Simons; Tumbleweed_Connection; marktwain
CCW, maybe. Methinks GWB is waiting to make the connection VERY solid and then it's bombs away....
5 posted on
10/20/2002 6:18:56 PM PDT by
ninenot
To: ninenot
Yah! LOL! "We don't have weapons of mass destruction but we will use them on you if you attack us!"
PPPPSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!
7 posted on
10/20/2002 6:21:01 PM PDT by
Cold Heat
To: ninenot
Should Saddam conclude that a U.S.-led attack could no longer be deterred, he probably would become much less constrained in adopting terrorist actions. So what? It's now or later. I'd rather see what he's got up his sleeve now than wait another 12 years.
To: ninenot
--> If Osama bin Laden could smuggle terrorists into the United States to carry out attacks why couldnt Saddam Hussein do the same? <--
Well why he didn't do this for past 10 years?
Did he need Osama for inspiration?
This article should be seen as part of the
WHY WE NEED TO INVADE IRAQ TOP 10 LIST
nothing amasing here to comment
9 posted on
10/20/2002 6:26:46 PM PDT by
bobi
To: ninenot
I would hope we have smuggled our teams into enemy capitals and cities so that we could respond in kind.
10 posted on
10/20/2002 6:29:31 PM PDT by
Siobhan
To: ninenot
I'll bet it's starting already. That beltway sniper isn't just some guy that went nuts one day and decided to become a spree killer. Saddam is putting out professional hits on random American citizens and this is only the beginning.
To: ninenot
The U.S. government does not know how many Iraqis have entered the United States illegally in recent years. For the Clinton re-election, they allowed thousands of immagrants to become US citizens without background checks because they were in a hurry to get them to vote. They just taught them the basics, and shipped them to cities that needed the votes.
Many have committed crimes on US soil, and are now in jail. That's how they found out the immagrants went through without the back ground checks. They never should have been allowed into the country in the first place.
If the Democrats were desperate enough to do this, I doubt if they checked anyone comming into the US during those years.
Right now, Kennedy is calling for bolistic fingerprinting to win her election, but never bothered to do background checks on gun buyers for months. She may just have needed the issue. One shooter, and her campain could be a shoe-in.
To: ninenot
Another Mohammed? You have got to be kiddin' me.
Why don't we just deport everyone named Mohammed?
To: ninenot
Scary stuff.
To: ninenot
...could start as soon as April 1995.
To: ninenot
bump for later
22 posted on
10/20/2002 7:16:58 PM PDT by
knak
To: ninenot
On October 3, a Washington jury convicted Iranian national Mohammed Hussein Assadi of smuggling Iraqis into the United States via Cali, Colombia, and other locations in South America. When does Bush Senior go on trial? I thought it was legal to smuggle Iraq military into the US. He did.
28 posted on
10/20/2002 9:36:27 PM PDT by
Demidog
To: ninenot
bump for later
32 posted on
10/21/2002 12:11:54 PM PDT by
GOPJ
To: ninenot
The U.S. government does not know how many Iraqis have entered the United States illegally in recent years. During the reign of the sinkEmperor, they entered without being illegal. We will pay for the eight years of clinton debauchery with precious lives, and the despotic democrat party will spin the deaths as the fault of the Bush administration. BUT, we best crush Saddam now as opposed to later when he has nuclear weapons to farm out. Sadly, the democrats and liberal appeaseNIKs will not make the connection that if Saddam would use one type of WMD he will use any WMD. Time for democrats to go!
40 posted on
10/21/2002 6:10:19 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson