[conservatism_IS_compassion]

[There should be] a national policy of favoring paternal custody in divorce cases . . . [because] most divorces are initiated by women, who (quite reasonably) expect to have the cards stacked in their favor in court.

Maybe just a presumption that the one who initiates the divorce does not get custody? A rebuttable presumption, but a presumption nonetheless . . .

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Maybe just a presumption that the one who initiates the divorce does not get custody? A rebuttable presumption, but a presumption nonetheless . . .

My rebuttal to your rebuttal... There may be just causes for initiating a divorce.  However, why don't we get rid of no-fault divorce.  That way, a divorce can only be granted for cause (infidelity, abuse, etc.) or if both parties agree.  If the divorce is granted for cause, the offending party gets jacked.  But if the divorce is not for cause (mutually agreeable), then both parties would be obligated to work custodial issues out - without interference from the gov.

[FReepaholic]

>>...the one who initiates the divorce does not get custody...<<

Interesting thought.

If the law stated that the person initiating the divorce automatically would NOT get custody then there might be fewer divorces. The spouses might just HAVE to learn to make the marriage work.

Interesting thought.

[Critter]

I would like a policy that penalizes the vows breaker.

Mom wants out, cuz she doesn't love dad any more, with no other compelling reasons, she leaves the house, and the kids with dad, and pays support. Dad wants out to be with the 21 year old secretary from work, well, he leaves the house, and the kids, and pays the support.

Vows are vows. Let's hold people accountable that break them. It's pretty simple really.