[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

Your pathetic attempt to create facts so as to justify your sick conclusion speaks volumes about yourself. He instigated his own beating, killing, and being burried by showing up in a skirt?

I guess a 17 year old boy in a skirt is scarry for you, but normal people can exist in a room with people they don't like without murdering them.

I guess I worded it poorly. The transvestite teen deliberately set out to deceive people into thinking he was a girl. He was playing a sad game (probably due to his youth). That's what I meant when I used the word "instigated". Perhaps I shouldn't have said "instigated". I should have said "left himself open to the possibility that people would be violently angry with him for deceiving them" or something like that.

I'm a woman, so the thought of a 17-year-old boy in a skirt is NOT scary for me. I was trying to imagine how young men in their 20s might feel after being deceived. Apparently these young men were so angry at the deception, after their sexual encounter, that they killed the poor pathetic transvestite teen. I don't think men's egos allow them to deal with that sort of a situation very effectively. Do you?

I certainly don't condone the murder. I hope these young men go to prison for a long time.

Forgive me for expressing my thoughts so inadequately.

[TheOtherOne]

I am glad you cleared that up. There is no reason a person in his 20's is so threatened by a boy in a skirt that he needs to murder him. There was no sexual encounter between any of them. They found out he was a boy dressed as a girl and simply beat, killed, and buried him. There is and can be no justification for this type of action unless they were physically threatened and acted in self-defense--- a claim even the 3 are not making.