Posted on 10/20/2002 7:48:19 AM PDT by SamAdams76
The photos above currently on the Drudge site concern me. I followed the link and the article clearly stated that nobody was arrested last night.
Why then, do we have drivers of white vans, innocent civilians, evidently being pulled out vans at gunpoint and treated like dangerous criminals? One photo shows a man on the ground, evidently in handcuffs, with police officers standing over him as though they have just captured Whitey Bulger. When I first saw the photo, I figured the man was obviously a wanted criminal that police just so happened to come across during their search. But since there were no arrests last night, this man was obviously released and was no criminal after all.
The other photo shows a man by another white van with his hands in the air and a police officer has a gun drawn on him. Again, this was evidently just another innocent civilian who had the misfortune to be driving a white van on I-95 last night.
Now I understand the need for these roadblocks and for the police to be very thorough in their search for the sniper(s). But I cannot see the point of innocent people dragged out of their vehicles at gunpoint with no pretext other than the fact that they happen to be driving a white van.
Now maybe somebody here has an explanation why these two individuals were treated like criminals. Maybe they tried to evade the police or maybe they were driving stolen vans. But again, there were no arrests made last night. So what is the deal with our citizens being treated like Jesse James just for driving a white van?
One of his other signs reads:
"Police are stopping white vans looking for terrorists! It's the end of the world!"
"Then why were all the guns pointed at them and other forced to lay face down in the street cuffed while they awaited a decision."
Damn , you people can't keep your railroad on track when you get in a jam.
You either produce the picture of the situation that you touted in #875 or retract your statement about the guns being pointed at someone. We are talking about this thread and the guns your imagination has conjectured up, not just the folks on the ground.
I guess you will start attacking some woman now.
Now tell the truth, I piss you off don't I?
Figures. I said, "there are no guns drawn in the 1st pic". The blonde may have a gun in her left hand, but she surely is holding a gun. It's not pointed at the guy, but he doesn't know that.
"You either produce the picture of the situation that you touted in #875 or retract your statement about the guns
I'll retract nothing. The cops used there guns and the force of the law to place that man on the ground when they didn't have to. There were others and I'll post that pick of the guy with the shotgun to his back tomorrow.
"I guess you will start attacking some woman now."
Whatever.
You really need to mellow out. You are close to a stroke.
Huh??
Only in your wet dream shall I stroke out.
They are kind of like the old Sinclair Dinasour Logo--- Big Ass, Little Tiny Head.
You have a thing about wet dreams don't you?
I don't even try. This is strictly entertainment on a par with carnival freak shows. You know you shouldnt make fun of the less fortunate but hell they put themselves on display so why not?
I see the radio clipped to her left side so I would assume she is right handed wouldn't you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.